Personal


Personal & Software & Team & Web20 Jan 2009 05:46 pm

A few years ago I met people behind many-eyes visualization project from IBM. Today, inspired by other things I have seen in the labs I decided to see what their site (http://manyeyes.alphaworks.ibm.com) has been up to. Always consumed by price of housing, I ended up comparing a larger number of cities by size and housing affordability (how many average incomes it takes to buy an average house).

Suddenly, New York looks pretty good.

In case you just want to go straight into the visualization, click here - http://manyeyes.alphaworks.ibm.com/manyeyes/visualizations/house-prices-to-income-ratio

Personal & Photography08 Jan 2009 05:19 pm

лапложд
«лапложд» на Фото.Сайте

Personal & Web30 Dec 2008 10:10 pm

Fred Wilson wrote:

It’s gotten to the point that if I can’t interact with content, I don’t want to consume it. When I read books, I underline certain passages so I can blog about them later. If I were reading on a connected device, I’d simply reblog on tumblr and be done. I don’t think I’m unusual in this regard but I do think I’m in the leading edge of behavior and that more and more people will feel this way.A VC, Dec 2008

Ditto. Take a look at books left over from old (100+ years) writers, scientists, people. They are full of notes on the margins. This type of interaction with text only stopped recently, perhaps because a lot of content consumption went one-way — magazines, newspapers, TV. An old notebook of my grandmother’s I recently found has pages written out from books she borrowed and found insightful but did not own to write directly in. My big hope is that next version of Kindle would provide some kind of a solution. It is possible that other readers already provide these capabilities and I am just unaware of them…

I see a lot of people also blogging as they read through a book - something this type of functionality would facilitate. Does the world really need people to post half-formed thoughts the moment they get an urge to share them? Probably not, but we already do (reading this post qualifies), so making this sharing easier is not going to make things worse, but perhaps encourage those for whom current means are too convoluted or complicated to participate in the discussion.

Personal & Web22 Dec 2008 06:13 pm

I like the simplicity, and surprising utitliy of LinkedIn applications. I was surprised to see a blog post from one of my connections, and within a few clicks configured LinkedIn to show my own blog posts. I suppose this is really useful for people who market themselves a lot - but also for people who have no other touchpoints with a lot of all of their colleagues and former colleagues.

Finally - I just think it is cool, and is another round of evolution in web mashups and in letting people share their informatin how they want it, where they want it.

Personal09 Dec 2008 02:33 am

I visited amazon.com today and saw that it picked Copenhagen (PBS Hollywood Presents)
as a recommendation. I remember seeing the play in NY and being totally transfixed. So now I am just trying to figure out who I know  that would like it as a gift but has not seen the play live, since I would very much like to buy it for someone :)

Personal & Web29 Sep 2008 07:23 pm

I have always been scared to blog under my name. This fear had a few components. I did notice, recently, that most of the blogs I follow are actually not anonymous. I used to read a lot of anonymous blogs, but over time most of those have either revealed their identities or have fallen away from my frequent reading list. I suppose some of it has to do with desire to get credit (obviously, that was my intent), but I think the larger issue is that - ultimately - it is hard to trust an anonymous person. Internet, gives a great deal of anonymity to people, but that also forces us to discount anonymous posters longer than “real” ones. There are many examples and discussions on this topic, and it is not really what I wanted to write about.

No. I wanted to think through, by typing, what it was that has kept me from blogging for a better part of 4 years. It was not lack of source material - certainly these times have an overabundance of that. There is an issue of time, of course. It is pretty obvious that to build a readership, posts need to come with regularity that is well-known to journalists, but not easy to maintain on IT guys’ schedule. It is also recommended to stick to a particular topic or set of topics in which one has expertise or strong convictions. That approach was lacking as well. I like to think by typing, and I am certainly not going to be maintaining 5 different blogs for a carefully segmented presentation of my world views.

What I realized, is that the few people whose blogs I actually read with any regularity where “reasonably smart guys” who put out whatever it was that they wanted to share. That’s it. Some of them I knew personally, some I did not, some I even mostly disagreed with. In all cases; however, it was something for me to think about, to talk to someone else about - and perhaps that’s what matters to me. So, I will make the fool out of myself - writing about things I know little about, as well as risking my professional growth by writing about thing I *should* know about, but perhaps do not.

I might even, seriously now, write a bit about my biggest development challenges - my kids. I am still not sure how far to go there. They will inevitably find this blog in a couple of years and I do not want them to be scarred/horrified/overly pleased.

Anyway, I probably have to write here, since my family and co-workers cannot take any more of my soliloquies.

Personal15 Jul 2008 10:49 am

From an alumni newsletter I get this line:

xxx is a passionate advocate for HIV/AIDS

 I have no doubt that the person being honored is not enamored of HIV/AIDS and does not wish to spread it far and wide. In fact, it seems quite the opposite, that his life’s work has been to eradicate the disease and lessen the suffering it causes. I have seen a similar phrase applied to other causes such as “an active Breast Cancer supporter”… Has this phrasing become acceptable and understood and I am just behind on this?

Personal14 Jul 2008 11:21 pm

to 2.0 software. Pretty neat…

It is amazing to me how fast we forgive and forget. It is taking Apple a week to undo over a year of hurt in not having an SDK and normal applications on the iPhone. Maybe they just wanted to take is slow and figure things out instead of rushing into it? But I cannot help but dislike the iTunes store.

Personal11 Jul 2008 03:50 pm

I have been using MindManager from MindJet for a few years (3? 4?) now. Today, I decided to give OneNote 2007 a chance. On one hand, it is a very impressive tool. On another… What I value in MindManager is the ability to easily make multi-level collapsible notes and sections. That does not appear to be a feature of OneNote.

 
 

I guess I will give it a shot and see how I like it.

 

Update: I was surprised by how easy it was to post from OneNote/Word to Wordpress. The integration is actually very well done. I am sure it will encourage me to post much random drivel.

Link Dump & Personal12 Oct 2007 02:45 pm

“Beginning Oct. 15, a monthlong discussion of “War and Peace” will appear in the online edition of The Times. The panelists will include Bill Keller, the executive editor of The Times; Stephen Kotkin, the director of Russian and Eurasian studies at Princeton University; and Francine Prose and Liesl Schillinger, both frequent contributors to the Book Review. The moderator will be Sam Tanenhaus, the editor of the Book Review. Readers can find the discussion at nytimes.com/books.”

from NYTimes Book Section

I suppose it would be too much to expect the times to publish the discussion as an RSS feed.

Update: There is, actually, an RSS feed for the NYT Reading Room blog, but the Times still is not ready to actually put full posts into RSS, just the abstracts.

Next Page »